The Difference Between Shame and Guilt

According to Wikipedia, the “dividing line between the concepts of shame, guilt and embarrassment is not fully standardized.”  Many people use guilt and shame interchangeably, but from a psychological perspective, they actually refer to different experiences.   Quoting from Wikipedia:

“Psychoanalyst Helen B. Lewis argued that ‘The experience of shame is directly about the self, which is the focus of evaluation. In guilt, the self is not the central object of negative evaluation, but rather the thing done is the focus.’  Similarly, Fossum and Mason say in their book Facing Shame that ‘While guilt is a painful feeling of regret and responsibility for one’s actions, shame is a painful feeling about oneself as a person.’”

I would go further and say that the action that inspires guilt usually involves the infliction of pain, either intentionally or unintentionally, upon another person.  As an example, in the anecdote I related in my post on envy and jealousy, I once said something hurtful at a dinner party, and on some level, I intended it to be hurtful.  Afterward, I felt guilty about my actions because I could see that I had hurt my friend.  More painfully, I also felt ashamed that I was the sort of person who would behave that way.  Guilt arose as a result of inflicting pain on somebody else; I felt shame in relation to myself.

As a therapist, I find this distinction to be  important and useful.  Many deeply troubled people have very little capacity to feel guilt, for example.  In order to feel guilt about the harm you may have done to somebody else, you must recognize him or her as a distinct individual, to begin with.  Thus a person who struggles with separation and merger issues might not feel true guilt even if he or she were to use that word to describe a feeling.  Many people who display narcissistic behavior often suffer from profound feelings of shame but have little authentic concern for other people; they don’t tend to feel genuinely guilty.  This explains why an authentic sense of guilt rarely appears in narcissistic personality disorder and anti-social personality disorder:  guilt depends upon the ability to intuit how someone else might feel and as a result to experience remorse for the pain one has caused.

When shame is especially toxic, it usually precludes feelings of genuine concern and guilt from developing; the sense of being damaged is so powerful and painful that it crowds out feeling for anyone else.  In such cases, idealization often comes into play:  other people are then viewed as perfect, the lucky ones who have the ideal shame-free life we crave; powerful envy may be the (unconscious) result.  In those cases, we might take pleasure in hurting the person we envy rather than feeling guilty about it.  I discussed this dynamic in
detail in my post about why we love and hate celebrities.

In others words, toxic shame reflects early psychological damage that impedes growth; the capacity to feel guilt depends upon that psychological growth and could be seen as emotional progress.  If the early environment is “good enough,” we develop a reliable sense of self that in turn enables us to view other people as separate and to feel concern for them.  Our ability to recognize that our own actions may have hurt someone, to empathize with that person’s pain and to feel remorse for having caused it are all signs of emotional health.

Finding Your Own Way:

Have you ever received an apology that felt as if it were more about the suffering of the apology-giver that your own?  If your forgiveness made no difference, if the person continued to berate him- or herself despite all the reassurance you offered, that would be an indication that the person felt shame rather than guilt.  A profound sense of being damaged probably motivated the apology, and for that reason, nothing you could say would have any effect.

Can you make this distinction in your own behavior?  A good place to look would be some incident where you hurt somebody and felt moved to tender an apology.  Did you imagine yourself in that person’s shoes, feel his or her pain and cringe with remorse?  Or was it your savage inner voice beating you up for making a mistake?  It’s a subtle but important distinction, reflecting the degree to which you can see people as truly separate and to feel their pain as opposed to simply feeling bad about yourself.  It’s not one or the other, of course; the mix exists along a spectrum.

There’s such a thing as appropriate guilt, just as there is appropriate shame.  Being able to tolerate and not be overwhelmed by them is a sign of mental health.

Bookmark and Share


This entry was posted in Rules of the Road, Shame/Narcissism, Social Behavior. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to The Difference Between Shame and Guilt

  1. Evan says:

    Hi Joseph. I think differently. I think shame pertains to our feelings in relation to our reference group and guilt is from us failing to live up to a rule or standard we have – usually also held by our reference but not necessarily.

    Those cultures which train children through shame rather than guilt often refer to ‘face’ and a characteristic posture of shame is hiding the face. That is: it is about our facing others.

    • Joseph Burgo, Ph.D. says:

      I agree to the extent that we are talking about shaming cultures, but when I talk about shame, I almost never mean that. I am talking about the shame that is the psychic residue of early damage, not caused by cultural or parental messages from the outside. It simply is. I understand what you mean about shame cultures and I agree, but that is not what I’m talking about. I discuss this issue in my post about basic shame.

  2. Evan says:

    Fair enough.

    What I understand you to mean by basic shame is the conclusion the child draws from the bad things done to them (the conclusion that they are therefore bad). I understand how awful this is for people.

    I do think that these people experience their shame in relation to others. Hiding their face and so on. I certainly agree that it involves a perception of ourselves.

    As to guilt. I think people can feel guilt even when others aren’t damaged eg. when someone tells a lie and they disapprove of lying even though no one has been damaged by it. I do agree that it has to do with actions. And that the child’s conclusion about themselves involves a feeling about who they are as a person.

  3. A Reader says:

    As usual, interesting and highly readable.

    It made me think of the statement that we enter this world innocent and leave with a load of guilt.

    Through reading your articles I have learnt that I have had more than my share of toxic shame. Through therapy and private dreamwork it has also dawned on me that there has been a lot of reason for gilt and remorse.

    Yet I take it that it differs widely from person to person, even among the “mentally perfect” how we perceive guilt? I mean, one may consider an episode to be a triffle not worth a second thought, while another may feel deep remorse for the same thing?

    • Joseph Burgo, Ph.D. says:

      In part, guilt depends on our internal values and these differ widely among people. For example, you might have a very high standard of behavior when it comes to being considerate of other people, and as a result, feel more guilty about an instance of your insensitivity than someone with less exacting standards.

  4. Sock De Jour says:

    Perhaps I should have read this post first, before commenting on the narcissism post.

    I think shame is rooted in guilt. Guilt that we’re taught, to at ourselves with shame. Children feel no shame. It’s something that adults teach them in response to social and behavioral situations that the parent or adult disapproves of, relating their disapproval to the child, making the child feel lessened and judged for what are usually natural and normal behaviors.

    I agree that the ‘common’ definition of guilt is something we are supposed to feel in relation to an occurrence that causes discomfort or pain to others, but I don’t think in psychological terms that they are really separate. Can’t guilt be internal, not just external? Isn’t shame an unwillingness to accept yourself, forgive yourself, be kind to yourself, but instead to seek real (or perceived) fault within yourself? To my mind, that’s not a natural state, that’s something that others have imposed upon us, and we live with those outside judgments, which we then internalize and carry throughout our lives, unless we can discard them and form our own values and ideals. And if the feelings of shame stem from those outside us, who have judged us, and taught us to feel shame, then the shame isn’t ours, it’s a projection that others have placed on us. It’s the remainder of guilt we were taught to feel about ourselves, which becomes our lack of self-forgiveness for mistakes, bad judgment or errant behaviors, that others found unacceptable, and in turn, taught us to find unacceptable. Perhaps I just reject the idea of shame, because I don’t believe it’s valid, productive or worthwhile.

    • Joseph Burgo, Ph.D. says:

      As I’ve said elsewhere, I think that the type of shame you are talking about is one variety; I’ve been trying to introduce another, that I explain in more detail in other posts, including this one on basic shame.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>